ADVERTISMENT

more

Review: Lyncanthropic Apathy

By Chance

February 15, 2010 at 12:18AM EDT

image

I’ve always had a soft spot in my cold, desolate heart for the Unviersal monsters. Partly because I appreciate the gothic sensibility on display, but mostly because I know what it’s like to be chased through the woods by a mob of angry villagers. I remember growing up in what would eventually became the state of Oklahoma, put on trial as a witch at the age of nine when the village’s radish crop mysteriously died. Good times, good times. So, I was looking forward to The Wolfman and hopefully the beginning of a new era in gothic horror.

There is a scene early in the film, where Emily Blunt‘s dutiful character sits by candle light, reading. The dust in the air around her is suddenly illuminated by the flicker of the candle, and for a moment, it looks like she’s surrounded by stars. I thrilled at this moment and immediately began imagining the possibilities of that traditional gothic sensibility taken in a whole new direction by modern technology. A stylized, yet seamless new vision of the archetypes of the genre: creepy old mansions, fog-drenched moors and suffocating taverns of suspicious townfolk. Sadly, as my imagination ran wild with the possibilities, the stylistic moment of brilliance was to be the last in a film that chooses to rely on all the old elements, with no new layer of commentary or style.

Benicio Del Toro began his career as Duke the Dog-Faced Boy in Big Top Pee-wee. Here, he returns to those roots and plays Lawrence Talbot, a soft-spoken, mild-mannered actor who returns home to investigate his brother’s death and take a little walk on the wild (and furry) side. Actors, he soon proves, are probably not who you want to send into any dangerous situation. I certainly wanted to like The Wolfman, and I really can’t say it’s a bad movie, more like a missed opportunity. It’s no coincidence that Lawrence is an actor. He’s been acting all his life, repressing and erasing a horrific secret from his childhood. He plays his part as a mild-mannered dandy all too well, though, and I never got the sense there is any sort of mayhem lurking underneath, trying to get out. His transformation into the beast should have been a freeing experience for someone so repressed, but no such connection is made, and while we’re told that Lawrence is a lunatic who could potentially snap, whether cursed by a werewolf or not, Del Toro underplays to such a degree, I just don’t see it.

While I applaud the craft of the production team, which included legendary makeup designer Rick Baker, the look of Del Toro’s wolfman is perhaps too much of an homage to the original Lon Chaney look. You’ll rarely hear me calling for more CG effects, but this is a case where the look needed to be just a little more stylized for a modern audience. That goes for the rest of the production. Overall, The Wolfman takes its story very seriously, which is in keeping with the tragedy, but also robs the film of any sense of fun or wonder. Again, while I fantasized about a renaissance in gothic horror, a modern reinvention of those dark and creepy visions, The Wolfman plays it by the book. I’m curious what a Tim Burton/Johnny Depp Wolfman movie might have been like. Burton is probably too Burton for this, but it’s that sense of reinvention and stylistic license this film, and the gothic horror genre in general, desperately needs.

    Comments

  • Havoc 02/17/2010 07:10 am

    I wish I had the time to give a full reveiw, because I absolutely love the origional, and went to see this last night.
    Didn’t hate it, but I agree it was a massively wasted oppertunity.
    Some of the changes in the story I thought really spoiled things. I loved Moleva in the origional and how she almost became a mother figure to Larry. She was reduced to being pointless in this version. I didn’t get why she even cared about saving Laurence. If like the origional she was rying to repair the damage caused by her son, it would have made much more sense.
    I didn’t really like it being set in jack the ripper days either. The origional had a very vague almost fairytale feel to when it was actually set, but it felt very current for the era it was made, so a wolfman set in the 30’s would have felt more ‘right’ to me.
    The wolfshead cane - nice to see it, but again.. solved no purpose.. may aswell have just left it out.

    Distancing it from the origional, it was good. But, I’d have liked to see the old story retold using todays standards and visuals.

  • Chance 02/15/2010 08:00 pm

    I thought you all hated my ratings system!

    On the FBOTU Scale of Fabulousness, I would give it 3 out of 5 rabid emoticons: vampire vampire vampire

  • Razz-Bel 02/15/2010 04:10 pm

    So, this movie didn’t get a “Chance\Fanboy-Smiley face” rating?  It must’ve been pretty bad. :(

Enter Your Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


ExpressionEngine Development